Many scientists assume that the growing level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will accelerate plant growth. However, a new study co-written by University of Montana researchers suggests much of this growth will be
curtailed1 by limited soil
nutrients2. The end result: By the end of the century, there may be more than an additional 10 percent of CO2 in the atmosphere, which would accelerate climate change.
"If society stays on its current
trajectory3 of CO2
emissions4 and the growth rates of plants don't increase as much as many models project, the result by the end of the century could be more extreme than we predicted," said Cory Cleveland, a UM associate professor of biogeochemistry.
The study was published in the journal Nature Geoscience. Cleveland and former UM doctoral student Bill Smith did the research, along with partners at the University of Colorado and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
"Humanity so far has greatly benefited from plants removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere," said Will Wieder, a National Center for
Atmospheric5 Research scientist
affiliated6 with CU. "But if a lack of nutrients limits their ability to keep soaking up CO2, then climate change becomes an even bigger problem than we thought -- unless society can cut back on emissions."
Cleveland and co-authors looked at 11 leading climate models to examine changes in nitrogen and phosphorus. They found that nitrogen limitation actually will reduce plant uptake of CO2 by 19 percent, while a combined nitrogen and phosphorus limitation will reduce plant uptake by 25 percent.
Most of the world's leading climate models assume that plants will respond to increased atmospheric levels of CO2 by growing more and more, which is known as the CO2 fertilization effect. The more the plants grow, the more CO2 they absorb from the atmosphere,
thereby7 slowing climate change.
"But CO2 is far from the only determinant of plant growth," Cleveland said. "Soil nutrients -- especially nitrogen and phosphorus -- also are critical. Because the supply of such nutrients is limited, scientists have warned that plant growth will be less than indicated in climate models."
He said most climate models so far have not included nutrients because such biogeochemical processes are difficult to simulate and vary greatly from one type of terrestrial
ecosystem8 to another. The Community Earth System Model from the National Center for Atmospheric Research,
jointly9 funded by the National Science Foundation and the U.S. Department of Energy, is one of the first to begin considering the role of soil nutrients in the models that are used for climate change
projections10.
语音朗读
扫码
顶部
反馈
收听单词发音